Canadian households
have been subjected to unfair income tax changes over the years.
Many changes were small and went unnoticed, but the cumulative
impact was severe and for some retirees, devastating. Only now
are seniors beginning to realize the compounded effect. Nest
eggs are vanishing and "Golden Ponds" are turning into "Quagmires".
Taxpayers in other G7 countries have options. Households can
file taxes as a family unit. Some duel-earners and wealthy Canadians
can split family income for tax reduction. Some use legal loopholes
like; establishing family trusts, incorporating within family
or forming a family business. Many simply put family members
on the firm's payroll to spread total household income among
its members. Provisions like Spousal RRSPs came too little and
too late for today's retirees. Seniors can split income if they
legally separate, but divorcing for tax-reduction purposes is
illegal in Canada.
This is unfair and unjust and creates two classes of citizens.
According to Mr. Frank and Carol Stokes in their Brief submitted
to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance on October
8, 2004. The basic definition of a progressive tax system is
horizontal equity where citizens under similar income circumstances
are treated equally. Canada's system claims to be progressive
but changes over the years have created a hybrid that defeats
the "progressive" criteria. Even Canada's claim of being "Individual-based"
Income Tax has been compromised by limiting tax credits based
on household income without allowing splitting.
The taxman cannot have it both ways. This is a violation of
Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. See
Website http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/
Also the changes to the Income tax act that came into affect
on January 1, 1996 for residents in Canada who received U.S.
Social Security came as an emotional shock as well as an economic
shock.
This change caused many retirees deep concern. Some of the
estimated 85,000 recipients who were retired at that point in
time had no options available to them. Their income earning years
was behind them.
Both these situations caused a great deal of grief and stress
not only on those people affected but also to those individuals
and non-profit organizations or work with or for individuals
such as the Windsor-Essex County Chapter of CARP (Canada's Association
for the Fifty-Plus).
|